Internal Quality Audit (AMI) of Agroecotechnology Study Program 2025
Evaluation of 2024 Performance | The University of Bengkulu
Bengkulu, October 2, 2025 – The Agroecotechnology Study Program, Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Bengkulu, successfully conducted the Internal Quality Audit (AMI) for the 2024 performance evaluation. This audit was organized by the Institute for Quality Assurance and Learning Development (LPMPP) as part of the university’s ongoing quality improvement system.
Leadership Attendance – The audit took place on Thursday, October 2, 2025, led by auditors Jatmiko Yogoprayitno, S.IP., M.Si. and Suci Rahmawati, M.Farm., Apt.
The session was attended by the faculty leadership, including:
- Dean: Dr. Indra Cahyadinata, S.P., M.Si.
- Vice Dean for Academic Affairs: Prof. Heri Dwi Putranto, S.Pt., M.Sc., Ph.D.
- Vice Dean for Finance and General Affairs: Dr. Ir. Suharyanto, S.Pt., M.Si.
- Vice Dean for Student Affairs, Alumni, and Partnerships: Dr. Hesti Pujiawati, S.P., M.Si.
As the auditee, the Agroecotechnology Study Program was represented by Prof. Dr. Ir. Catur Herison, M.Sc. (Head of the Study Program), accompanied by the AMI Team and the Study Program’s Internal Quality Assurance Group (GKM). Their active participation demonstrated strong commitment to the audit process and continuous quality assurance.
Audit Process – The audit consisted of three main sessions:
- Opening Meeting – Introduction of audit objectives and scope.
- Field and Desk Evaluation – Document review and interviews with lecturers, staff, and students.
- Closing Meeting – Presentation of audit findings and follow-up action agreements.
Audit Results – The audit assessed nine accreditation criteria with the following scores:
- RSB: 3.69 (58 items assessed)
- Strategic Goals Achievement: 3.68 (11 items assessed)
- Study Program Instruments: 3.96 (12 items assessed)
➡️ Overall Average Score: 3.78 (Very Good)
Key Findings – The program met all 58 assessed aspects with valid evidence, reflecting strong documentation practices. The auditors also provided constructive recommendations, including:
- Strengthening alumni tracking.
- Conducting tryouts for competency/professional exams.
- Procuring learning support equipment.
- Regularly updating website content.
- Improving student achievements at national and international levels.
Most instruments scored 4.0, except for the student criteria (C3), which scored 3.5.
Conclusion – With an overall score of 3.78, the Agroecotechnology Study Program is classified as “Very Good.” This achievement reflects the program’s commitment to education, research, and community service, and provides a solid foundation for future improvement.
Prof. Dr. Ir. Catur Herison, M.Sc., Head of the Study Program, stated:
“This audit is not only an evaluation, but also a motivation to continuously enhance academic and non-academic quality. With strong support from the faculty, department, and academic community, we are confident in building an excellent and competitive study program.”
